Advertisement

KPSC KAS Results (Gazetted Probationers) 2018 KPSC KAS Cut Off Score, Eligibility List for main

by
Advertisement

KPSC KAS Result 2017-2018. KAS Gazetted Probationers Results & Eligibility List for the Main exam. KPSC KAS GP Results Declaration Date. Karnataka PSC Gazetted Probationers Prelims exam Expected Cut Off Scores (Discussion)|

Advertisement

We are starting an opinion poll to get the average scoring marks to know the actual cut-off marks. Please share your estimated marks in the poll. By doing this we can calculate the KAS Cut-off score for the Preliminary Examination.

KPSC KAS Preliminary Exam Result & Cutoff Score details

The Karnataka Public Service Service has successfully completed a preliminary examination for Gazetted Probationers in the State Administrative Services (KAS) on 20 August 2017. In the next phase, the recruitment authority will announce the result for this exam. The KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers (GP) Result is likely to be declared within two or three months. The candidates can check the KAS GP Result by using the Login ID (Application No.) and Password (Date of Birth) on the official website.

In 2015, a recruitment for 401 posts of KAS Gazetted Probationers in various departments of the Karnataka State. Applications were invited from the eligible candidates for these posts. As per the organizational information, A large number of candidates shown interest in this recruitment. A massive number of applications were received. The authority conducts a written examination (Prelims) for the registered candidates on 20.08.2017 respectively.

KPSC Gazetted Probationers Result

Organization’s Name Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC)
Name of Post Gazetted Probationers
Total Vacancies Group A – 150

Group B – 251

Total Posts – 401
KPSC Gazetted Probationers Written Examination (Prelims) Date 20 August 2017
KPSC Gazetted Probationers Result Declaration Date ———
Website http://www.kpsc.kar.nic.in/

 

The KAS Gazetted Probationers Preliminary Exam took place on 20/08/2017. A massive number of candidates appeared in the examination. The candidates who have been a part of the test are eagerly waiting for the result for the same.

The KAS recruitment authority will announce the KPSC Preliminary Exam result as soon as possible. The result is likely to be declared in the third week of October. The candidates will be able to check the KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers Result by using the application registration number and date of birth.

KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers Result get

The Commission releases KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers Result 2017 in online or offline mode. In case, if the results are released in online mode, the applicants have to visit the official website and enter their login credentials such as Registration No. and Date of Birth. After entering these details, the detail will generate your result on the desktop screen. Now you can check your KPSC Gazetted Probationers results and can also get the provisional result sheet for future reference.

Whereas, to check the KPSC Result KAS Prelims Result 2017 through offline mode, the candidates have to get the result in pdf file from the official website. In the offline, the Commission will upload the KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers Result 2017 in Pdf format. In which all the qualified candidate’s Registration No. and Name is provided. The candidates can use Ctrl+F in order to search their Registration No. to check the result. The Commission will upload mark sheet on the official website after declaring the KPSC Administrative Services Exam Result 2017. The candidates can get the result sheet for the provisional use.

KPSC Gazetted Probationers Cut Off Scores

The Preliminary Examination had two papers with each carrying 200 Marks. The applicants need to score minimum qualifying marks in each paper to qualify. The candidates who qualify in the preliminary examination are eligible to appear in the mains exam. The Commission will announce the mains exam date, a few days after the declaration of KPSC KAS Prelims Exam Result 2017.

The recruitment authority will finalize the cut-off marks on the basis of difficulty of the exam, the number of applications received vs the number of vacancies and number of appeared candidates. A notification regarding category-wise cut-off marks will be published on the official web portal. The candidates will be intimated on their registered email id and mobile number also.

How to check KPSC KAR Gazetted Probationers Result 2017:

  • First of all, visit the official website at http://www.kpsc.kar.nic.in/
  • Find the detail named KPSC Gazetted Probationers (Prelims) Result
  • . on the detail and Fill the required details like reg no. & Pass
  • Check the filled information and . on the proceed button
  • The KPSC KAS Gazetted Probationers Result will be shown on your desktop screen
  • get it and take a valid print out for provisional use

20,424 thoughts on “KPSC KAS Results (Gazetted Probationers) 2018 KPSC KAS Cut Off Score, Eligibility List for main”

  4. Some of u people r saying that kpsc will follow upsc pattern for reservation. But I don’t think so. Just see the final list of FDA released by kpsc. In that in page no 9 a candidate with name SHASHIDHARA B C
    Reg No: 3126193 has been selected in the cat: GM/3A/RL and notice his DOB, which is 14.09.1980.
    What does that mean?
    A person who has used his caste and category for age relaxation should not be put in GM. Am I right?
    He has used his category for age relaxation. For GM age limit is 35. For OBC it’s 38. This is it.

    Reply

    • It was a flawed policy followed by kpsc until now …. From your recruitment it’s going to change which is what the judgement says ….

      Moreover that candidate was 37 when he applied for the FDA exam i.e he has turned 38 recently …

      Reply

        • I think it will not change because all states apart from usual reservations of caste, they also use horizontal reservation for women, rural etc. When u see this reservation it is almost up to 80- 85 percent reservation, which is basically against the SC order of not more then 50 percent reservation policy.
          So I don’t think kpsc will follow ups pattern.

          Reply

    • Yes… U r right.. N Kumar judgement doesn’t focus on end result.. it just focusses on maintaining 50:50 ratio.. so Do not keep ur hopes high regarding UPSC pattern…But new reservation policy won’t affect much for those categories with 4pc reservation..

      Reply

  5. File may be received by DPAR on Monday since the concerned official was absent for this entire week…There is no re mains matter in kpsc but do not know how the matter got surfaced.. who spreads these rumours!.. results MAY come in third week of November if everything goes in our favour 🙂

    Reply

  6. For those who are abusing me I passed the information which I got from reliable sources . I will not get anything by sharing fake info here . If u don’t like my info , just ignore it. I stick to my words November 21st -23rd. Mark the date in red color !!

    Reply

    • Hello so called man of trust Before abusing some body you should know that all are shared information here whichever they got, don’t act like too smart OK.
      21st is govt holiday. File Yet to reach kpsc, then commission will think about feed back, later they prepare list, after preparing list they will decide about results..

      Reply

      • Kindly go through my statement . I said within 21st -23rd . I know 21st is a holiday !! If u don’t like then u are free to ignore my statement . I don’t get anything if I spread rumours here . As a civil servant , u r required to behave in a dignified way , that’s lacking in you .. prepare well for interview .

        Reply

        • When you abused some one as a joker who shared information here at that time where was your so called civil servant behaviour dignity?
          First rectify yourself then talk about other bro. No offence good luck

          Reply

    • Le tamma yar le nin abuse madiddu.
      Adeno mark the date, i wont comment till then antha aakidde. Yaru kyare anlilla. Adakke matte start madkonde.
      Hogi sarkari aaspatre alli torsko hogu.

      Reply

  7. Reservation issue

    One who gets selected in reserved category in prelims, example 170 obc,
    He can’t be selected in mains under gm categOry , even he becomes state topper

    Reply

  8. Results on 21st November . Don’t waste your time listening to rumours here. Almost everyone know that results will be out by 21st .

    Reply

    • 21st govt holiday, fake news peddler.

      Innu file kpsc ge reach aagilla, aagle result date Commission decide maadidiyaa?
      Gobald yaakro hege hotte urstiraa

      Reply

  10. the question of meritoriousreserved candidate being considered in the place of a general
    merit candidate would not arise, at this stage.
    what does this mean
    me scoring good marks than a gm candidate i only placed under 3a but der are only 3 to 4 vacancy
    4 3a despite scoring more than gm will i b out of the list?
    if such was d case i wudnt have applied under category 3A
    PLEASE SOMEBODY HELP N EXPLAIN

    Reply

  11. The real winner never runs for results to come.. he knows results will run and come to him.. so pls forget and be cam and cool

    Reply

  12. TO put all the speculations to rest I would sincerely urge the aspirants residing in Bengaluru to visit kpsc on Monday n meet Secretary , ,this is the most logical thing that we can do

    Reply

  13. @Geeta mam n Vijay sir …kindly update on kas mains result ……there s so many genuine aspirants like me in this forum,who r counting on u ppl …kindly ignore trollers …y do u have to back out for these jobless insensitive ppl ..?..waiting for yo updates .kindly inform us !Thans in advance

    Reply

  15. Next wk, likely 2 announce d results. Anybody who is well versed of today’s meeting in detail, pl share.Aspirants be optimist. All d best.

    Reply

  16. ಪತ್ರ ಗಣಕ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ : 49826/2014
    ಪತ್ರ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ ಮತ್ತು ದಿನಾಂಕ : NIL/50947 06/09/2014
    ಪತ್ರ ಸ್ವೀಕೃತಿಯಾದ ದಿನಾಂಕ : 07/09/2014
    ವಿಷಯ : 2014ರ ಕೆ.ಎ.ಎಸ್.ಅಧಿಸೂಚನೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸುಪ್ರಿಂ ಕೋರ್ಟ್ ನಮಾನದಂಡ ಪ್ರಕ಻ರ ಮೀಸಲಾತಿ ಮಾದರಿ ಅನುಸರಿಸಬೇಕೆಂದು ಕೋರಿ.

    Reply

  18. Any updates on today’s meeting? Some are saying there is a chance of re-exam due to implementing of new rules of Reservation? Kindly clarify guys I got this news from some official.

    Reply

    • Fake Vijay.
      Vijay never uses inside sources and all.
      Vijay is not commenting for quite some time now. As there is nothing much to tell apart from speculating.
      So people here are taking advantage and commenting in his name.

      Reply

  21. 1) 15th
    2) 23rd
    3)november last week
    4) December 7 or 10th

    Interview dates
    If results come before this month end, interview starts from around 15th December, provisional list in February.

    Reply

  22. Though I have the information , I don’t want to share . I may be abused here again if at all I pass any information . Belated dipawali wishes everyone

    Reply

  23. Just to make it clear , I am not kaka . Even I feel pity on those who beliieved kakkas words .
    He is a biggest joker
    Mark the date in red color, November 21st -23rd . Till then I will not comment again !!? Good luck . I just passed the information what I received . If u want to believe , u can. Else no issues

    Reply

    • God. Diwali is also gone now.. Next sankranti and then ugadi.. Nd more important d elections. Code of conduct.. Seriously pathetic…

      Reply

    • 21st november(may be +2 days)!! i stick to my previous words,
      i am not fool and joker like kaka.
      a minute of silence for those who believed joker kaka

      Reply

    • Biggest fools sit in tat office… Before also he tried fooling people.. Now v r in a position to decide Wat is gong to b true n wat not… So ya..tat shimoga guy is fake.. He hardly knws anything n keeps blubbering Wat he feels… Dnt trust his words… Nevr was he right…

      Reply

  30. Now that most of the holiday festivals are done..can we expect anything good in coming week!!???? Really fed up.. God save us.. In watever short lifespan these days people have, we aspirants are screwing it badly…

    Reply

  31. KPSC is going to seek explanation from candidates who had written ‘symbols’ in mains by sending letter. Therefore result may be delayed by one month….

    Reply

      • Next to next Wednesday govt holiday????
        Everyone astrologer here, file even not reached KPSC, already started predicting dates, let file reach kpsc first, let us see commission what they will do about FEEDBACK, then only we can get result dates.
        Even secretary also don’t know result dates, stop playing with emotions friends.

        Reply

  35. was not active in site for last few days..

    as per kaka result should come tomorrow.. Kaka where are you..
    dont run away like “ಕಣ್ಗಾವಲು”

    Reply

      • hey fake..
        habbakke hogilva manege??
        still misusing others code name.. you will turn into sadist i am telling you.. go home and light some candles..

        i wont comment further..

        #real ಕಣ್ಗತ್ತಲು

        Reply

    • Results dates

      Former secretary prasanan kumar- February end

      Present secretary – within 10 days (September)

      Chairman-after July 15th

      Controller- may month end
      Monday..

      These officials given wrong information officially in print media and social media , you don’t Have spine to ask them, but here your attacking some guys who shared information whichever they got..

      Reply

  37. As Abc saying goin according to this judgmnts scoring good marks becomes disadvantage because reservation claimed candidate are not put under general merit despite scoring good marks or higher than GM and there are only few seats available in reservation 3 to 4 for 3a

    Reply

  38. Final order.

    Therefore, it is clear that, first a consolidated list
    of eligible applicants irrespective of their caste, tribe, class,
    is to be prepared and arranged in the order of merit which is
    called the first list.
    128. The word used is, “consolidated list”. Till such
    stage is reached, necessarily, there should be more than one list. One list of meritorious unreserved candidates and one
    list of meritorious reserved candidates. It is to maintain the
    ratio of 50:50 stipulated under the Rules, at the time of
    admitting the students to take the written examination and
    calling for Personality Test, two separate merit lists are to be
    maintained. It is at the stage of preparation of the list of
    candidates suitable for appointment, the Rule 11 provides
    for reservation of vacancies. At that stage, the Government
    Order mandates that the Selection Authority shall first
    prepare consolidated list of all eligible applicants irrespective
    of caste, tribe, class and arrange them in the order of merit.
    Till such time in the preparation of list, caste, tribe, class,
    plays a dominant role, in order to give equal opportunity to
    all of them. At the time of appointment, merit is the criteria.
    This consolidated list is called the First list. In other words,
    the first list contains the names of all the persons who are
    called for personality test and the marks secured by them
    both in the written examination and the personality test.
    Their names are arranged in the order of merit. From out of
    this list a second list containing the names of thecandidates equal to the number of posts to be filled up on
    the basis of general merit, i.e., the number of posts other
    than those reservation in favour of Scheduled Caste,
    Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes arranging
    them in the order of merit commencing with the first name
    in the first list. It is here for the first time the word
    “GENERAL MERIT” is used and explained. General merit
    means the number of posts other than those reserved in
    favour of Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and other
    Backward Classes. According to the Government order
    dated 31.01.1995 and 20.06.1995 the number of post
    reserved for Scheduled caste, Scheduled tribe and other
    Backward Classes is 50%. The remaining 50% posts are to
    be filled up by the General Merit category. This reservation
    is in consonance with the law laid down by the Apex Court in
    Indira Sawhney’s case. The relevant portion of the
    Government Order dated 20.06.1995 reads as under:
    “ªÉÄÃ¯É PÁt¹zÀ ¢£ÁAPÀ 31-1-1995 ¸ÀPÁðj DzÉñÀzÀ°è
    »AzÀĽzÀ ªÀUÀðzÀªÀgÀ «ÄøÀ¯Áw ¥ÀæªÀiÁtªÀ£ÀÄß ±ÉÃPÀqÁ
    “50PÉÌ” ¤UÀ¢¥Àr¹zÀ »£É߯ÉAiÀÄ°è gÁdå ¹«¯ï ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼À, ¸ÀPÁðgÀzÀ C¢ üãÀzÀ°è §gÀĪÀ ¸ÉêÉUÀ¼À CxÀªÁ ºÀÅzÉÝUÀ¼À
    £ÉêÀÄPÁwAiÀÄ°è ¨ sÁgÀvÀ ¸ÀA«zsÁ£ÀzÀ 16(4)£Éà C£ÀÄZÉáÃzÀzÀ
    ¥ÀæPÁgÀ C¼ÀªÀr¸À¨ÉÃPÁzÀ gÉÆøÀÖgï §UÉÎ ¥Àj²Ã°¸À¯ÁVzÉ.”
    129. After the preparation of the second list then
    excluding the portion forming the second list, a third list
    has to be prepared from out of the first list containing the
    names of candidates belonging to the Scheduled Caste,
    Scheduled Tribe and Other Groups of Backward Classes
    equal to the number of vacancies reserved for each reserved
    category in the order of merit determined in the first list.
    After this exercise, then a final list which is called the main
    list of selected candidates for appointment to the category of
    posts for which the selection is made by arranging the
    names of candidates included in the second list and the
    third list in the order of merit. While preparing this list, the
    reservation policy of the State under Article 16(4) of the
    Constitution is to be given effect to. It is at this stage, a
    meritorious unreserved category could be considered as a
    General Merit category because of his merit. This is the procedure contemplated by the Rules
    for holding of competitive examinations, conduct of
    competitive examinations and the manner in which adequate
    number of candidates belonging to the categories of
    Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, each of the Other
    Backward Classes and Others is to be accommodated in the
    same ratio as that of candidates belonging to the unreserved
    category. Now, the question is whether KPSC has followed
    this procedure in conducting these examinations and in
    preparing the list of suitable candidates

    Reply

  39. FIFTH STAGE:
    Rule 11 of the Rules provides
    for preparation of list of candidates suitable for appointment.
    It provides that, subject to the provisions of sub-rule (3) of
    Rule 4 and Rule 8, and the number of posts advertised foreach of the services in Group ‘A’ and Group ‘B’, the
    Commission shall prepare separate lists of names of the
    candidates equal to the available number of vacancies
    considered suitable for appointment for each of the said
    services in Group ‘A’ and Group ‘B’ arrange in the order of
    merit determined on the basis of total marks secured in the
    main examination comprising written examination and
    personality test, provided that the name of a candidate shall
    not be included in more than one such list. Therefore, it
    provides for preparation of consolidated list of names of the
    candidates equal to the available number of vacancies in the
    order of merit determined on the basis of total marks
    secured in the main examination comprising written
    examination and the personality test. In other words, the
    marks secured by the candidate in the written examination
    and the personality test is to be totaled. Thereafter, a merit
    list is to be prepared.
    126. Rule 8 of the Rules provide that, there shall be
    reservation of vacancies for candidates belonging toScheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward
    Classes to the extent provided for by the Government by any
    general or special order from time to time. The preparation
    of list of candidates suitable for appointment is subject to
    Rule 8. The Government of Karnataka by an order dated
    3.5.1994 has provided how the reservation of appointments
    in direct recruitment to the State Civil Services under Article
    16 (4) of the Constitution of India is to be made. The said
    Order provides for mode of selection. Para 5 of the said
    order prescribes that, the order of selection to be followed for
    the proper implementation of the reservation provided in this
    Order, is given in Annexure-2. This shall be followed by the
    Public Service Commission and all other selecting
    authorities. Annexure-2 to the said Government Order
    dealing with mode of selection reads as under :

    Reply

  40. Fourth Stage:

    The personality test shall carry a
    maximum of 200 marks. The object of the personality test is
    to assess the personal suitability of the candidate for the
    service or services for which he is a candidate. The qualities
    to be judged at the time of personality test are mental
    alertness, critical powers of assimilation, clear and logical
    exposition, balance of judgment, variety and depth of
    interest, ability for social cohesion, leadership and
    intellectual depth of the candidate. After such personality
    test, mark is awarded to each of the candidates who appear
    for the personality test. As the maximum marks prescribed
    for personality test is 200, the examiners have to award such
    marks the candidate is entitled to on their observation. This
    is the procedure prescribed under Rule 4 of the Rules.
    123. The candidates whose names find a place in the
    two lists prepared after the written examination in the order of merit in the ratio of 1:5 are eligible to be called for the
    personality test. In the personality test each candidate is
    awarded marks based on their performance by the
    examiners. Therefore, after the completion of the personality
    test, again two lists showing the number of marks secured
    by each candidate in the personality test are to be prepared,
    i.e, first list showing the marks secured by each candidate
    among the unreserved candidate and second list showing the
    marks secured by each candidate among the reserved
    candidate.
    124. Therefore, there will be two lists in each category
    one list showing the marks secured in the written
    examination and another list showing the marks secured in
    personality test.

    Reply

  41. Third Stage:

    This is the conduct of the main
    examination. It shall consist of written examination and
    personality test. Clause (B) of Section I of Schedule II speaks
    about the written examination, the subjects and the marks
    prescribed and the number of papers each candidate has to
    take while writing the written examination. Note 1 makes it
    clear that the marks obtained in compulsory papers, i..e, in
    Kannada and in English shall be of qualifying nature. For
    qualifying in these papers, a minimum of 30% on each paperand 35% aggregate is prescribed. However, the marks
    obtained in these two papers shall not be considered for
    determining the merit for selection. Candidates who had not
    secured the prescribed marks in qualifying papers, namely
    Kannada and English, shall not be eligible for personality
    test and selection.
    120. Illustration: If 2000 persons as aforesaid,
    belonging to reserved and unreserved category in the same
    ratio, write the examination, after such examination, a list
    showing the result of the main examination is to be
    prepared. In this list also all the 2000 persons who took the
    written examination name finds a place. No cut off marks or
    minimum marks is prescribed in the Rules for passing in the
    examination. However, the list not only shows the marks
    secured by each candidate but also should disclose the
    category to which the said candidate belongs. All the
    persons whose names find a place in the list showing the
    results of the main examination are not eligible to be called
    for the personality test. The Rules provides that theCommission shall call for a personality test, as far as may
    be, five times the number of candidates as there are
    vacancies in the services in Group ‘A’ and Group ‘B’
    respectively, of Schedule I. i.e., when there are 100
    vacancies to be filled up, the number of persons who should
    be called for the personality test is only 500. In other words,
    among the 2000 candidates whose names find a place in the
    list showing the results of the main examination, only 500
    persons have to be called for the personality test. The basis
    for the candidates being called is again in the order of merit
    on the basis of the results in the main examination. The
    same is again subject to the condition that candidates
    belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other
    Backward Classes have to be called for the personality test
    in the same ratio to the extent vacancies are reserved for
    them. Therefore, even at the time of calling the candidates
    for personality test, the ratio has to be maintained. In other
    words, the number of candidates to be called for the
    personality test belonging to the unreserved category and the
    reserved category should be in the same ratio. Therefore,again two lists, one of reserved candidates and the other of
    un-reserved candidates in the same ratio has to be prepared.
    Only those candidates are to be called for the personality
    test.
    121. For 100 posts, if 500 candidates have to be
    called for the interview, among the 500, 250 should be from
    the unreserved category and 250 from the reserved category.
    The basis for inviting these 250 candidates in each category
    is again in the order of merit. As in the list showing the
    results of the main examination not only the marks secured
    by each candidate but also the category to which they belong
    is clearly mentioned, 250 candidates belonging to the
    unreserved category in the order of merit should be called to
    the personality test. Similarly, 250 candidates belonging to
    the reserved category in the order of merit should be called
    for the personality test. At this stage also the question of
    meritorious reserved candidate being called to the
    personality test as a unreserved candidate would not arise.
    Therefore again two lists, first list showing 250 names of theunreserved category and second list showing 250 names of
    the reserved category to be prepared.

    Reply

  42. First Stage: All the candidates who possess the
    academic qualification prescribed under Rule 7 are eligible to
    take the preliminary examination. The preliminary
    examination consists of two papers of objective type (multiple
    choice). Each paper carries 100 questions with each
    question carrying 2 marks and each paper shall be a
    maximum of 200 marks and of duration of two hours. The
    description of the subject area, the number of questions and
    marks prescribed in Paper I and Paper II are as stipulated in
    Schedule II. The question paper shall be set both in
    Kannada and English. There is no cut off marks prescribed
    for pass in the preliminary examination. After thepreliminary examination, all the persons who had taken the
    examinations are included in the list on the basis of the
    merit. The names of the candidates are arranged in the said
    list purely on the basis of merit, i.e., marks secured in the
    preliminary examination and not on the basis of any caste
    consideration. At this stage the caste of the candidate is of
    no relevance and the question of applying the reservation
    policy under Article 16 (4) of the Constitution of India would
    not arise.
    116. For example, if 10,000 candidates take the
    preliminary examination, after examination a list showing
    their performance is prepared on the basis of merit/marks
    secured in the preliminary examination. In other words, the
    names of all the candidates who wrote the preliminary
    examination find a place in the list showing the marks
    obtained by them. The names are arranged in the order of
    merit. As there is no cut off or minimum marks for a pass in
    the examination is prescribed, the list should show the
    names of all the persons who took the preliminaryexamination showing the marks secured by them. However,
    the names in the list shall be arranged in the order of merit.

    Reply

    • Second stage:

      Taking the preliminary
      examination is a condition precedent for being eligible to
      take the written examination. However, all the persons who
      had taken the preliminary examination are not entitled to
      take the written examination. Clause (C) of Section I
      provides that the number of candidates to be admitted to the
      main examination shall be 20 times the vacancies notified
      for recruitment. In other words, as against each vacancy 20
      candidates whose name finds a place in the list of candidates
      who had taken the preliminary examination are admitted to
      the written examination. Those 20 candidates against each
      vacancy are selected in the order of merit on the basis of the
      performance in the preliminary examination. Therefore, even
      to take the written examination, merit is the sole criteria.
      However, it is subject to one condition, i.e., adequate
      number of candidates belonging to the categories of
      Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and each of the otherBackward Classes and others have to be accommodated in
      the same ratio. In other words, here a distinction is made
      between candidates whose merit alone is taken into
      consideration and candidates whose caste is taken into
      consideration. The number of candidates to be admitted to
      the main examination shall be candidates who are
      permitted/admitted to take the examination purely on the
      basis of merit and equal number of candidates belonging to
      the reserved categories. Therefore, necessarily two lists have
      to be prepared at this stage. One list showing the names of
      the candidates belonging to the unreserved category and
      another list showing equal number of candidates belonging
      to reserved category.
      118. For example, if recruitment is conducted to fill
      100 (Group A and B) posts, 20 times, the 100 would be
      2000. Therefore, out of 10,000 candidates whose name finds
      a palce in the performance list of preliminary examination,
      only 2000 persons are to be admitted to the main
      examination. Out of the 2000 students 1000 students are toBackward Classes and others have to be accommodated in
      the same ratio. In other words, here a distinction is made
      between candidates whose merit alone is taken into
      consideration and candidates whose caste is taken into
      consideration. The number of candidates to be admitted to
      the main examination shall be candidates who are
      permitted/admitted to take the examination purely on the
      basis of merit and equal number of candidates belonging to
      the reserved categories. Therefore, necessarily two lists have
      to be prepared at this stage. One list showing the names of
      the candidates belonging to the unreserved category and
      another list showing equal number of candidates belonging
      to reserved category.
      118. For example, if recruitment is conducted to fill
      100 (Group A and B) posts, 20 times, the 100 would be
      2000. Therefore, out of 10,000 candidates whose name finds
      a palce in the performance list of preliminary examination,
      only 2000 persons are to be admitted to the main
      examination.

      Reply

      • Out of the 2000 students 1000 students are tobe admitted from unreserved category, 1000 candidates
        should belong to the reserved category. In other words,
        equal number of reserved category and unreserved category
        should take the written examination. If in the list of
        performance of the preliminary examination, Sl. No. 1 to
        2000, if there are 1500 candidates belonging to the
        unreserved category and 500 candidates belong to the
        reserved category, only 1000 out of 1500 candidates
        belonging to the unreserved category in the order of merit
        have to be admitted. It means, 500 candidates, who are less
        meritorious within 2000 list will not be eligible to take two
        written examination. As only 500 reserved candidates are
        found among the first 2000 candidates, remaining 500
        candidates have to be selected from the list below 2000, in
        the order of merit, to enable 1000 candidates belonging to
        Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and other Backward
        Classes and others to take the written examination. This is
        what is meant by the expression “subject to accommodating
        “same ratio” in adequate number of candidates belong to the
        categories SC, ST; each of the other backward classes andothers”. Therefore, the ratio of 50:50 is to be maintained at
        the time of writing the written examination. If on the other
        hand, among the first 1000 candidates out of 2000
        candidates, 800 candidates belong to the unreserved
        category and 200 belong to the reserved category, 200
        candidates belonging to the unreserved category in the order
        of merit from the candidates below the 2000 in the list is to
        be selected and 800 candidates belonging to the reserved
        category from the candidates below the 2000 in the list are
        to be selected. If the procedure now followed is applied only
        800 candidates from unreserved category would be eligible
        and 1200 candidates from reserved category would be
        eligible. Thus, the ratio rule of 50:50 is breached. The
        resultant position would be 200 meritorious candidates from
        the unreserved category would be denied the opportunity to
        write the examination. It is contrary to express provision
        contained in the Rules and violates Article 14 and 16(1) of
        the Constitution of India. Though caste/class plays a
        dominant role at this stage in selecting the candidates to
        write the written examination, the question of meritoriousreserved candidate being considered in the place of a general
        merit candidate would not arise, at this stage. There is no
        migration of a meritorious reserved candidate to the
        unreserved category, contemplated at this stage. On the
        contrary, the rule specifically states the “same ratio” is to be
        maintained between reserved and unreserved category of
        candidates. Therefore, at this stage two lists are to be
        prepared. First list containing only 1000, unreserved
        category candidates and second list containing only 1000
        reserved category candidates.

        Reply

  43. As I said earlier , kaka was the most funniest guy in this forum . I don’t think he has even written mains and kept on predicting fake dates and some fools were believing his words . Now he has disappeared from this forum . He is a loser !!
    Coming to reservation issue , its all about delay tactics and kpsc will follow the old rule . Dabi case was notHing to do with kpsc . I have seen many aspirants posting the fake and unauthentic news. Don’t pay heed to rumours
    Coming to results , since this week is filled with long holiday and as per the news I got from inside sources , results will be out by November 21st or 2 days after . Have a safe dipawali . Good luck

    Reply

  44. ಪರ ಮತ್ತು ವಿರೋಧ ವಾದ ಮಾಡುವರು ಕೋರ್ಟ್ಗೆ ಹೋಗಿ ಕೇಸ್ ಹಾಕಿ ನಿಮ್ಮ ವಾದ ಮಂಡಿಸಿ, ಸುಮ್ಮನೆ ಬಾಯಿಗೆ ಬಂದ ಹಾಗೆ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಸಿದ್ದಾಂತ ಮಂಡಿಸಿ ಗೋಜಲು ಉಂಟು ಮಾಡಬೇಡಿ, ಮೊದಲೇ ತಲೆ ಕೆಟ್ಟು ಹೋಗಿದೆ ಅದರಲ್ಲಿ ಇವರದು ಬೇರೆ…

    ಊರಿಗಿಂತ ಮುಂಚೆನೇ ಇವರಿಗೆ ಲಾ ಡೆಪಾರ್ಟ್ಮೆಂಟ್ ಸಲಹೆ kpsc ಒಪ್ಪಿಕೊಂಡ್ರಾ ಇಲ್ಲ ಎಲ್ಲವೂ ಗೊತ್ತಾಗಿಬಿಡತ್ತೆ,ಕರ್ಮ

    ರಿಸಲ್ಟ್ kpsc website ಅಲ್ಲಿ announce ಮಾಡ್ತಾರಾ ಅಥವಾ ಅವ್ರಿಗಿಂತ ಒಂದೆರಡು ದಿವಸ ಮುಂಚೆ ನೀವೇ ಯಾರಾದ್ರೂ mollad ಅಲ್ಲಿ ಹಾಕ್ತಿರಾ?

    Reply

  45. Kpsc have horizontal reservation so it can’t follow upsc rules like Tina Dabi, it’s simple logic kindly understand it..

    Tina dabi case nothing to do with Kumar judgment case.

    Reply

    • Who ever told u that Tina Dabi case is followed here?? This judgement was given by HC in june 2016 before Tina Dabi verdict…
      It was upheld by SC in April 2018…
      No state PSC is following Tina Dabi case… Because here horizontal reservation makes it cumbersome… There is a fresh merit list and reserved list prepared after every stage which is not the case with UPSC..

      Reply

    • @Abc

      Sanketha has got it completely wrong … The more you ask her / him
      You get confused …. Judgement is in GM favor ….but we have to see whether kpsc follows it or not …

      Each stage is not independent of the other as sanketha is saying …. No where in the judgement you can find it , except in the argument section made by K M prakash pg no 252 …. The very fact that HC had dismissed the hitherto followed procedure by kpsc is a ruling in GM favor and an indication to change the rules applied in 1998 ,1999 ,2004 recruitments ….. Let’s c what kpsc comes up with ….

      Reply

      • Yodha… U mean to say that a person who cleared prelims under 3AG now can compete only for 3 posts??
        A person who scored 182 cannot compete for GM Kannada posts coz GMk cut off is 184??
        U r making it pre centric examination ..
        I din’t feel awkward when u tried to present ur argument . But I feel yuck about u for misleading people and driving them towards stress
        Well.. God bless u 🙂

        Reply

        • Obviously …. That is where the judgement about the ratio comes to picture ….

          According to your analysis

          4000 in unreserved list and 4000 in reserved list
          If all the 4000 reserved list candidates score more than candidates in reserved list candidates ,which is hypothetical , the unreserved list should be thrown into dustbin … Is it ?

          Ridiculousness of the highest order and you feel yuck about my argument ….

          Misleading is not my job friend ….presenting the facts is

          Reply

          • Yodha… I am pretty sure that ur assumption of facts is totally false… If there are 4000 people in the reserved list in the order of merit who can fill both reserved and Unreserved.. it can happen… 3a person competing only for 3 posts is heights of misunderstanding reservation system… I have got my facts right even with a legal expert… So.. if u want to believe what u presume.. u r free brother… Let’s not argue anymore… Facts won’t change with us arguing… There are orders to implement the court issue for mains list itself.. everybody will realize the fact once lists are out… I am not gonna argue anymore.. but try to understand why two lists are recommended… We are good 🙂 BYE 🙂

  47. And also the judgement has given some tabulations, examples,etc..Go through that… 1:2.679 ratio was maintained for GM …This is the flaw that the court is trying to address….nothing else… Judges have insisted on maintaining 1:5 for GM… If you people still want to interpret it in your own ways… I can’t help you ..

    Reply

  48. KPSC can’t follow rules like what UPSC followed in TInA dabi case. KpSc follows it’s own rules.
    Sanketha explained in laymans language but we are unable to understand it…

    Result delay madbeku antha aadtiro aata kanrappa artha madkoli.

    Reply

  49. Now another question

    Let us say both candidates are from 3b . One cleared prelims in gm category and other candidate clears in 3b cut off.

    In mains only, if one candidate scores exceptionally well more the gmail cat and the other cand scores less than GM .

    Question: will first candidate qualify mains in gm ?

    Second may or may not qualify in 3b ?

    Reply

  50. @Sanketha can you solve this problem statement

    1. There are 2 candidates. Both belonging to 3A category. One candidate clears prelims GM cut off (184) . Other candidate clears prelims in 3A category cut off.

    Now both has very high marks in mains and interview say more than GM.

    Who can claim which category?

    Reply

    • The judgement has explicitly stated that each stage is independent of the every other stage… Not like UPSC where there is vertical reservation… Both the persons are still in the race for GM at the time of final list preparation .. depending on their scores… But during the preparation of lists at the mains and interview … They have to maintain two separate lists… Reserved and Unreserved… Hence in order to accommodate more GM students … These two people who have claimed category will be placed under reserved list… So that two GM candidates who have scored lesser will be accommodated under Unreserved list.. it’s essentially only to maintain ratio of 50:50… During the final stage if these two persons have secured highest marks.. say 1st and 2nd rank… They will be eligible for GM as well as 3A … It won’t affect much for those categories with 4pc reservation… It will affect other categories… But it won’t violate reservation policy..

      Reply

  52. @Rage
    Again a flawed logic/analysis.
    Government has accepted and making arrangements to implement it.
    People or so called devotees are complying with it.
    So no contempt from govt end. Only a law and order situation.

    Reply

  54. Kpsc will prepare list according to old rules so don’t bother about reservation issue, don’t put more time in reading judgement and discussing here, utilise that time for reading.

    Reply

    • That’s what even I told ….list will be prepared based on old rules …..people here r speaking just to satisfy their ego .?

      Reply

    • On what basis are you telling this?
      The advice is not placed in front of commission yet.
      What people here are discussing is the advice tendered by law department.
      You just dont speak without any logic. Or a flawed one

      Reply

      • Based on the well placed official in kpsc only am telling this …everything in kpsc doesn’t work as per logic ..get that straight into yo head first ,before commenting ….n 505 judgement is not a circus ,but not applying it s the circus !!!?

        Reply

        • If it doesn’t work by logic … We know how to make this work …. Kpsc is not above constitution ….. Work for the larger good not to meet your narrow ends …. Take this into your head in which ever way possible not necessarily straight into your head …. and keep this in your head and don’t let it vaporise …..

          Reply

          • Dude I just passed on the info …not like I’m supporting wrong things …..there s nothing to get offended …I know how much guts ppl have to ho against the govt (kpsc ) .I saw that during the protest ..but may be u r an exception ..go ahead all the best ?

          • Delaying results declaration is one thing , vitiating the selection process is another thing …. Every single candidate will come to streets to take on the system if he is at the receiving end …. We have slogged for years and they have made us to wait for our results for an year …. We are not gonna wash our hands off ….come what may …. Peace out ,???

          • Coming to protest or not, leave.. Wat happnd to 2011 batch you kno it in out! So u decide if things will go smoother, if they don’t go according to some important judgements. Why wud they risk of again goin to SC on case of contempt of court! !!?? This time supreme Court might get kpsc closed if again case reaches sc.. N they fear it…so let’s evryone chill n watch Wat they ll do…

        • Just for your clarification.
          Not just officials can such a decision. Commission has to take it.
          Let them place it. Going against a SC order is not a simple job.
          Even they will be aware of contempt and litigation issues for not following.
          You wait and watch.
          If an official wants to go by old procedure why will even secretary ask for advice?

          Reply

  56. I went through the judgement.
    Reserved candidates are eligible for Gm posts.
    But should they have to follow upsc pattern? I couldnt make out.
    Any law students please clarify.

    Reply

    • Reserved candidates being eligible for GM is different from candidates form reserved list being eligible for general merit list ….. Hope you get the point ….. Judgement clearly pronounces to maintain the ratio when calling for the mains examination and personality test …..further more it clearly specifies as to where meritorious reserved candidates (MRC) be placed in the process ……

      Reply

      • Good point.

        You mean Candidates in reserved LIST cannot enter general list? Anyway this is after final list when some of the Candidates reject the post and when they try to fill the vacancies.

        And , you mean, Candidates from reserved CATEGORY can enter to general category Post in final list? .this is in contradiction to Tina dabi example.

        Reply

        • king reservd category and reserved list .. made based on prelims score is it?
          example reserevd categiry enrering gm list by merid i blong 3a but cleared prelims i gm so i am eligiblr 4 reservd n gm both post
          2nd exmple i belong to 3a in reservd list .scored lower than gm n cleared only in 3a .so in final i am eligible oly 4 3a post? is it,?

          Reply

    • Yodha… I went through it again… In fact for the 7th time.. I stand by my argument… During the preparation of the final list the government order has to be followed which is allowing meritorious reserved candidate occupy Unreserved post… Till then he shall be placed under reserved list… This is to maintain 50:50 ratio..

      Reply

        • Puneeth.. Government order refers to 94 rules which is already under force.. Kpsc used to follow the process of migration of meritorious reserved candidate to Unreserved category at every stage ( pre,mains,interview).. SC verdict says maintain two lists for mains,interview and during the final stage follow the government order.. I have put it in as simple words as possible 🙂

          Reply

      • My stand is that kpsc was conducting the process in violation of the reservation principle,that kept the unreserved candidates at the disadvantageous position , which needs to be changed …..

        To be precise each stage is not independent of the other stage which was the case hitherto ….

        Reply

  58. You argument is premised on selective excerpts that supports your stand …… Please go through the document again and help yourself to get the clarity ….. People here are already perturbed by prolonged delay and your words are adding to the fire ….

    Reply

  59. One more request people… Please read the judgement and comment… People who do not have their facts right are asking me to get my facts right on this forum.. judgement is upheld by two courts… There are no ultravires.. even after reading if u don’t understand please contact any law experts.. do not misinterpret and drive others towards stress….

    Reply

  60. hmm i read it now accrdingly reservation candidates at huge set back.
    eventhough i clearing more marks than gm candidate ll b placed under 3a der are oly 3 to 4 posts goddd
    i wud hav not tagged dat caste certificate.
    despite scoring r clearing in gm its horrible

    Reply

  63. If u r getting confused.. I won’t explain any further… Read the judgement once… U will realize the fact…neev helotharane maadodaadre changes enu iralla…. Hope for the best.. Bye 🙂

    Reply

  64. And Guys go through the judgement once… U will realise that it’s a very good judgement.. That’s why it was upheld by the Apex court as well… Judges included the likes of FALI NARIMAN.. Nobody needs to panic… It’s not gonna make huge difference.. BUT ITS DEFINITELY SKEWED IN FAVOUR OF GM.. COZ 50:50 RATIO IS MAINTAINED AND AT THE SAME TIME RESERVATIONS ARE TAKEN CARE OF TOO 🙂 PLEASE READ THE JUDGEMENT ONCE 🙂

    Reply

  66. There can be migration from reserved to general at the final stage… because every stage is independent of the other stage… A new merit list will be created at every stage..
    EVEN LOGICALLY SPEAKING IT CAN HAPPEN BECAUSE GM CUT OFF WILL BE LOWER.. HENCE 240 GUY WOULD BE ELIGIBLE BOTH UNDER RESERVED AS WELL AS UNRESERVED.. BECAUSE HE SATISFIES BOTH 🙂

    Reply

  67. Third point.. People will ask why was it not followed during Preliminary examination?
    Answer is Preliminary examination result was declared during August 2017..
    But the Apex court upheld the erstwhile Karnataka hc judgement in April 2018.. it was from April 2018 the order became binding… Kpsc is now bound to follow the rules or else it will be contempt of the court..
    PS- Rajasthan has already started to Implement this order… GM cut off is lower..
    🙂 Happy Deepavali guys 🙂

    Reply

  68. Second point… N Kumar judgement focusses on the maintenance of the ratio 50:50 for Unreserved and reserved category…Hence.. reserved seats will be filled first.. Unreserved lists will be filled later.. u can expect category cut offs to be way higher than what they are now .. and GM cut off to be way lower than what it is now
    Eg:- suppose a guy scored 240 in pre and also has claimed 3a category… He won’t be placed under Unreserved list but he will be placed under 3A.. hence category will be filled from the top.. not from the bottom like it was earlier.. 🙂

    Reply

    • dude, if a person scores 240 in prelims, he will be placed in GM for mains and not reserved category. he is eligible for both GM and reserved category for interview. its opposite of what you are saying..

      there is no migration from reserved to General. But there can be migration from GM to reserved.

      Reply

      • This is wrong… Two lists are to prepared as per the judgement.. reserved and Unreserved..
        If the 240 guy is placed under GM.. what’s the problem.?? It’s like the same old system… Why amendment..?? whats new??
        If he is placed under 3a now itself.. then his place could be occupied a GM guy who has scored lower than him.. Thus maintain 50:50 ratio at the mains and interview stage 🙂 hope it’s clear buddy 🙂

        Reply

          • hangadre sanketha watz d point ..reserved people who hav just attachd resrvation certifacte copy..but havent calimed r used anywer in prelims..but hav cleared in gm..still thy ll b pushed 2 category only?? watz d point in scoring high marks.
            get your facts clear
            see high r giod score madode tapppagatthy nin helotara adre

          • Nope… It won’t… U will be eligible for both reserved as well as Unreserved… According to the judgement if u r placed under reserved category at the initial stage.. it’s only for name sake… Please underline this point.. AT THE END IF U SCORE HIGHER U CAN BE PLACED BOTH UNDER GM AS WELL AS CATEGORY…. UNDER THE NEW JUDGEMENT RESERVED LIST WILL BE STRONGER( LIKE THE PRESENT GM LIST)… DO NOT BE AFRAID… IF U HAVE SCORED WELL.. U WILL BE REWARDED WELL.. read the judgement brother 🙂

        • its all about whether a person who cleared prelims in reserved is eligible under GM for final list. some one has already explained with example. pls read and understand.

          Reply

    • It cannot way too lower or way too higher….few marks changes will definitely be there …coz not many candidates who have cleared in category in prelims will score really higher marks compared to the ones cleared in gm itself …there will be few exceptions like Tina dabi ….coz even for mains ur facts n need to correct ,not just prelims ….

      Reply

  69. Hello folks… The N Kumar judgement has declared that every stage in the process is independent of the other stage… Hence.. like UPSC u cannot corelate prelims marks with that of mains or final list.. So Tina Dabi case is irrelevant wrt horizontal reservation.. Eg: A female who scored 104 in prelims and cleared pre under SC female category can be placed under GM in the subsequent lists.. BECAUSE EACH STAGE IS INDEPENDENT OF THE EVERY OTHER STAGE.. 🙂

    Reply

  73. but end of the day heighest scoring gm candidate will b at advantage.. bcoz he can b placed in gm n reserved post also..
    but category claimed in prelims candidate ll b at loss howevr more he scores he ll b placed in category only kno..
    goin accordin 2 your inference scoring more marks thappa.?

    Reply

  74. ಅಂತಿಮವಾಗಿ ಹೇನು ಮದುತಾರೆ ಸ್ನೇಹಿತಾರೆ?
    UPSC ಮೀಸಲಾತಿ
    ಅಥಾವಾ
    ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ಸಿ ಮೀಸಲಾತಿ ನಾ?

    Reply

  75. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
    DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2016
    PRESENT
    THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR
    AND
    THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA
    W.P.No.27674/2012 c/w W.P.Nos.41366/2012,
    27730/2012, 43718 & 43720 – 43732/2012, 4297/2013
    & 1733/2013 (GM – PIL)

    Reply

    • 115. First Stage: All the candidates who possess the
      academic qualification prescribed under Rule 7 are eligible to
      take the preliminary examination. The preliminary
      examination consists of two papers of objective type (multiple
      choice). Each paper carries 100 questions with each
      question carrying 2 marks and each paper shall be a
      maximum of 200 marks and of duration of two hours. The
      description of the subject area, the number of questions and
      marks prescribed in Paper I and Paper II are as stipulated in
      Schedule II. The question paper shall be set both in
      Kannada and English. There is no cut off marks prescribed
      for pass in the preliminary examination. After thepreliminary examination, all the persons who had taken the
      examinations are included in the list on the basis of the
      merit. The names of the candidates are arranged in the said
      list purely on the basis of merit, i.e., marks secured in the
      preliminary examination and not on the basis of any caste
      consideration. At this stage the caste of the candidate is of
      no relevance and the question of applying the reservation
      policy under Article 16 (4) of the Constitution of India would
      not arise.
      116. For example, if 10,000 candidates take the
      preliminary examination, after examination a list showing
      their performance is prepared on the basis of merit/marks
      secured in the preliminary examination. In other words, the
      names of all the candidates who wrote the preliminary
      examination find a place in the list showing the marks
      obtained by them. The names are arranged in the order of
      merit. As there is no cut off or minimum marks for a pass in
      the examination is prescribed, the list should show the
      names of all the persons who took the preliminaryexamination showing the marks secured by them. However,
      the names in the list shall be arranged in the order of merit.
      117. Second stage: Taking the preliminary
      examination is a condition precedent for being eligible to
      take the written examination. However, all the persons who
      had taken the preliminary examination are not entitled to
      take the written examination. Clause (C) of Section I
      provides that the number of candidates to be admitted to the
      main examination shall be 20 times the vacancies notified
      for recruitment. In other words, as against each vacancy 20
      candidates whose name finds a place in the list of candidates
      who had taken the preliminary examination are admitted to
      the written examination. Those 20 candidates against each
      vacancy are selected in the order of merit on the basis of the
      performance in the preliminary examination. Therefore, even
      to take the written examination, merit is the sole criteria.
      However, it is subject to one condition, i.e., adequate
      number of candidates belonging to the categories of
      Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and each of the otherBackward Classes and others have to be accommodated in
      the same ratio. In other words, here a distinction is made
      between candidates whose merit alone is taken into
      consideration and candidates whose caste is taken into
      consideration. The number of candidates to be admitted to
      the main examination shall be candidates who are
      permitted/admitted to take the examination purely on the
      basis of merit and equal number of candidates belonging to
      the reserved categories. Therefore, necessarily two lists have
      to be prepared at this stage. One list showing the names of
      the candidates belonging to the unreserved category and
      another list showing equal number of candidates belonging
      to reserved category.
      118. For example, if recruitment is conducted to fill
      100 (Group A and B) posts, 20 times, the 100 would be
      2000. Therefore, out of 10,000 candidates whose name finds
      a palce in the performance list of preliminary examination,
      only 2000 persons are to be admitted to the main
      examination. Out of the 2000 students 1000 students are tobe admitted from unreserved category, 1000 candidates
      should belong to the reserved category. In other words,
      equal number of reserved category and unreserved category
      should take the written examination. If in the list of
      performance of the preliminary examination, Sl. No. 1 to
      2000, if there are 1500 candidates belonging to the
      unreserved category and 500 candidates belong to the
      reserved category, only 1000 out of 1500 candidates
      belonging to the unreserved category in the order of merit
      have to be admitted. It means, 500 candidates, who are less
      meritorious within 2000 list will not be eligible to take two
      written examination. As only 500 reserved candidates are
      found among the first 2000 candidates, remaining 500
      candidates have to be selected from the list below 2000, in
      the order of merit, to enable 1000 candidates belonging to
      Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and other Backward
      Classes and others to take the written examination. This is
      what is meant by the expression “subject to accommodating
      “same ratio” in adequate number of candidates belong to the
      categories SC, ST; each of the other backward classes andbe admitted from unreserved category, 1000 candidates
      should belong to the reserved category. In other words,
      equal number of reserved category and unreserved category
      should take the written examination. If in the list of
      performance of the preliminary examination, Sl. No. 1 to
      2000, if there are 1500 candidates belonging to the
      unreserved category and 500 candidates belong to the
      reserved category, only 1000 out of 1500 candidates
      belonging to the unreserved category in the order of merit
      have to be admitted. It means, 500 candidates, who are less
      meritorious within 2000 list will not be eligible to take two
      written examination. As only 500 reserved candidates are
      found among the first 2000 candidates, remaining 500
      candidates have to be selected from the list below 2000, in
      the order of merit, to enable 1000 candidates belonging to
      Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and other Backward
      Classes and others to take the written examination. This is
      what is meant by the expression “subject to accommodating
      “same ratio” in adequate number of candidates belong to the
      categories SC, ST; each of the other backward classes and

      Reply

  78. Justice should be equal to every one dear, if some come one clears prelims with reservation how they can be eligible to get GM seats in final lists???

    UPSC rules are best, I’m heart fully thank the person WHO APPLIED RTI to kpsc reg Reservation procedure, I will pray for him/her to get success in this exam. And I also thank secretary who sought information from dpar.

    Last but not least thanks to true fighter Khalil Ahmad 98,99 batch, coz of his case we are getting justice….
    Winter is coming??????

    Reply

    • I don’t know how much effect this will have, but I want to clarify you the present rules.
      Prelims cut off
      GM 182
      OBC 172
      OBC Rural 162
      SC 152

      Preliminary score’s
      GM 192 —> Whatever the score is he is eligible for GM only
      OBC —> 192 —>Eligible for GM and OBC reservation
      OBC 176 —> Eligible only under OBC category even if he scores more than GM candidate in mains.
      SC –> 192 Eligible under GM and SC
      OBC rural —> 192 —> Eligible for GM, OBC and OBC Rural.

      Reply

    • Draw back also their. If a category guy clears with higher marks than gm after interview, he will be placed in cat only.gm guy will neither get in gm nor in cat.earlier if cat guy got more then he would’ve been placed in gm n gm guy who got lesser than cat after into would’ve at least placed under cat

      Reply

      • but end of the day heighest scoring gm candidate will b at advantage.. bcoz he can b placed in gm n reserved post also..
        but category claimed in prelims candidate ll b at loss howevr more he scores he ll b placed in category only kno..
        goin accordin 2 your inference scoring more marks thappa.?

        Reply

  83. They given feedback to follow new rules according to KUMAR judgement strictly.
    Commission will discuss and decide about that feedback on Wednesday or Friday. If commission decided to accept the feedback result will be delayed few days.

    Reply

      • It’s reg 1998+99 batch Khalil Ahmad

        K.R. Khaleel Ahmed and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by its Chief Secretary and Others..

        Means to follow rules like upsc, eg.tina dabi.

        Those who cleared prelims in category are not eligible to get posts in GM.

        Now ball is kpsc court, let’s see what they will take decision

        Reply

          • If it’s just to check patience means,. Dpar would have sent follow old procedure, now kpsc should prepare list like court order or else it would have become contempt of court brother.

    • Dude when the file has still not been approved by DPAR Dept ,how the hell in this world do u have an update ???I am srybut this a fake info ..

      Reply

      • Thi is law department feedback bro, dpar will send same feed back. Moreover trusting this information left to you, I shared whichever I got, some are already saying kpsc received file on Saturday itself… It’s up to you, you can ignore my information

        Reply

  84. ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ ಸಿ ಕಚೇರಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸೀನಿಯರ್ ಅಸಿಸ್ಟೆಂಟ್ ನಿಂದ ಮಹಿಳಾ ಸಹೋದ್ಯೋಗಿ ಮೇಲೆ ಚಾಕು ಇರಿತ…
    By JK Team – November 5, 2018025

    tweet
    knife-senior-assistant-female-colleague-kpsc-office
    ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ನ,5,2018(www.justkannada.in): ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್ ಸಿ‌ ಕಚೇರಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಸೀನಿಯರ್ ಅಸಿಸ್ಟೆಂಟ್ ವೋರ್ವ ಮಹಿಳಾ ಸಹದ್ಯೋಗಿಗೆ ಚಾಕು ಇರಿದಿರುವ ಘಟನೆ ಇಂದು ನಡೆದಿದೆ.knife-senior-assistant-female-colleague-kpsc-office

    ಕೆಪಿಎಸ್‌ಸಿ ಸೀನಿಯರ್ ಅಸಿಸ್ಟೆಂಟ್ ರಾಜಲಕ್ಷ್ಮೀ ಚಾಕು ಇರಿತಕ್ಕೊಳಗಾದ ಮಹಿಳೆ, ಸಹೋದ್ಯೋಗಿ ನಟರಾಜ್ ಎಂಬಾತನೇ ಚಾಕುವಿನಿಂದ ಇರಿದಿರುವ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿ. ರಾಜಲಕ್ಷ್ಮಿ ಮತ್ತು ನಟರಾಜ್ ಇಬ್ಬರು ಸೀನಿಯರ್ ಅಸಿಸ್ಟೆಂಟ್ ಆಗಿ ಕೆಲಸ ನಿರ್ವಹಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ.knife-senior-assistant-female-colleague-kpsc-office

    ಈ ನಡುವೆ ಮೊದಲು ನಟರಾಜ್ ಮತ್ತೊಬ್ಬ ಉದ್ಯೋಗಿ ಮೇಲೆ ಹಲ್ಲೆ ಮಾಡಿ ನಂತರ ರಾಜಲಕ್ಷ್ಮೀ ಅವರಿಗೆ ಚಾಕುವಿನಿಂದ ಇರಿದಿದ್ದಾನೆ ಎನ್ನಲಾಗಿದೆ. ಕೂಡಲೇ ನಟರಾಜ್ ನನ್ನ ವಿಧಾನಸೌಧ ಪೊಲೀಸರು ಬಂಧಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ, ಗಾಯಾಳು ರಾಜಲಕ್ಷ್ಮಿಯನ್ನು ಮಲ್ಲಿಗೆ ಆಸ್ಪತ್ರೆಗೆ ದಾಖಲಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ. ಘಟನೆಗೆ ಕಾರಣ ತಿಳಿದುಬಂದಿಲ್ಲ, ಈ ಕುರಿತು ವಿಧಾನ ಸೌಧ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಠಾಣೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ರಕರಣ ದಾಖಲಾಗಿದೆ.

    Key words: knife Senior Assistant – female colleague – KPSC office

    TAGSfemale colleagueknife Senior AssistantKPSC office

    Reply

  91. ಹಬ್ಬದ ಸಡಗರಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಏನಾದರೂ ಹಿ ಸುದ್ದಿ ಇದೆಯಾ ಗೆಳೆಯರೇ? ಕೊನೇ ಹಬ್ಬ ವೂ ನಿರಾಸೆ??????????

    Reply

  92. ಹಬ್ಬದ ಸಡಗರಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಏನಾದರೂ ಹಿ ಸುದ್ದಿ ಇದೆಯಾ ಗೆಳೆಯರೇ? ಕೊನೇ ಹಬ್ಬ ವೂ ನಿರಾಸೆ???????????

    Reply

  93. ಹಬ್ಬದ ಸಡಗರಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಏನಾದರೂ ಹಿ ಸುದ್ದಿ ಇದೆಯಾ ಗೆಳೆಯರೇ? ಕೊನೇ ಹಬ್ಬ ವೂ ನಿರಾಸೆ????????????

    Reply

  94. ಹಬ್ಬದ ಸಡಗರಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಏನಾದರೂ ಹಿ ಸುದ್ದಿ ಇದೆಯಾ ಗೆಳೆಯರೇ? ಕೊನೇ ಹಬ್ಬ ವೂ ನಿರಾಸೆ?????????????

    Reply

  95. ಹಬ್ಬದ ಸಡಗರಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಏನಾದರೂ ಹಿ ಸುದ್ದಿ ಇದೆಯಾ ಗೆಳೆಯರೇ? ಕೊನೇ ಹಬ್ಬ ವೂ ನಿರಾಸೆ??????????????

    Reply

  96. ಫೈಲ್ ಇನ್ನೂ CS ಹತ್ತಿರ ಇದೆ, ಯಾರಿಗೂ ಅವರು ಏನು ಸಲಹೆ ಕೊಡುತ್ತಾರೆ ಅನ್ನೋದು ಗೊತ್ತಿಲ್ಲ, ಲಾ ಡೆಪಾರ್ಟ್ಮೆಂಟ್ ಏನು ಹೇಳಿದೆ ಅನ್ನೋದು ಗೊತ್ತಿಲ್ಲ. ರಿಸಲ್ಟ್ ಯಾವಾಗ ಬರುತ್ತೆ ಅನ್ನೋದು ಅವರು ಕೊಡೊ ಸಲಹೆಯನ್ನ kpsc ಪರಿಗಣಿಸುವುದ್ರ ಮೇಲೆ ನಿಂತಿದೆ, ಆದ್ರೂ ಮುಖ್ಯ್ ಪರೀಕ್ಷೆ ಬರೆದಿರುವ ಬಾವಿ ಆಫೀಸರ್ಸ್ ಅವ್ರು ಫ್ಯಾಕ್ ಇವರು ಹೇಳೋದು ಪಕ್ಕಾ ಮಾಹಿತಿ ಅಂತ ಹೇಗೆ ನಂಬುತ್ಯಿರಾ???? ಇದುವರೆಗೂ ಯಾರು ಹೇಳಿದ್ದು ನಿಜವಾಗಿಲ್ಲ, sec contro chair ಅವರು ಹೇಳಿದ ಸಮಯಕ್ಕೆ ರಿಸಲ್ಟ್ ಬಂದಿದ್ದರೆ ಇಷ್ಟೋಟ್ಟಿಗೆ ನಾವು ATI ಮೈಸೂರು ಅಲ್ಲಿ ಇರಬೇಕಿತ್ತು

    Reply

Leave a Comment